From chaumond at gmail.com Sun Sep 19 06:35:09 2010 From: chaumond at gmail.com (Julien Chaumond) Date: Sun Sep 19 06:35:16 2010 Subject: [uf-discuss] hReceipt vs. hListing with a transaction date Message-ID: Hi list, hListing tells the world that someone is selling/renting something, but shouldn't there be a way to express that someone bought (or rented, etc.) something, i.e., transaction has indeed taken place? Real-world examples include any (online or offline) commerce receipts, but also "social commerce" services like Blippy or Apple's Ping that publicize users' purchases. I did my homework and read the lists, and found that a Receipt microformat was proposed which would fit this purpose (http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/2007-July/thread.html#647). However, wouldn't it be more straightforward to add an optional element to a hListing, for example a datetime element specifying the transaction's date? Cheers, Julien From singpolyma at singpolyma.net Thu Sep 30 06:49:01 2010 From: singpolyma at singpolyma.net (Stephen Paul Weber) Date: Thu Sep 30 06:59:26 2010 Subject: [uf-discuss]
inside
Message-ID: <20100930134901.GA15029@mediacentre> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I am trying an hCard (which is contact information for the page owner in this case) as a
inside
. The HTML5 validator does not complain about this, but it doesn't seem to work for Optimus or http://hcard.geekhood.net Specifically, when I feed:
test
Both of them say I didn't put an fn, but when I feed:
test
It works fine. Whaaaa? - -- Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma Please see for how I prefer to be contacted. edition right joseph -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMpJVMAAoJENEcKRHOUZzeWHQP/RpwSGNbxY1d7Vkym4V4P+PD v2fo+inWEQV7Dz3tkqNPjlhr1asMdNFVjkPhYV7DnU41JoD5KYhp+DWrV6phviqM JrkvqwIPkQwWjzuqRI+xn51KPT9ok6X4pLbNazMlNwaVQs1Zlf4tvAYGMh1P5htT mluYa0uRIRrVQe/mOr9v5HCnm7W6bpQTFWpst1yRYnH0n3wKLJr7r/xiL6gBitl0 xV6looRqV4vyMBx50lDuO2kr61SMrlXGze1kEhWyzobW9HNBYDcdANpogrZ3+xGU mS3dJQf4hCxRKUkAR8uxqByFzG/w+z/VN/tTKgS9VmXnJ8i0AiB96QCGuN/y89gY TqT8MzE5RmD8+EF+78DPhp+q5q23X5sidq88nmzUhb8nGy2YAfsvMM3HGsDB1jFe PHD5HEdN+hkGJr842XFnTPZ3m3ir99nSD7We546mPTTod/rqjsdsoN3vZ3RNWFUs iGlq/bXltIVJxdThWzVPYsG20ZPUZrdNVWhOITeOfk5khUOKSxWyQ9cICippKnWD vBPysUIeoIh3wtBjNZQzYBBrAOcM12hKiZk0XjoNo5zVO3KdP6oQPT+DnRbBOMFN Rg8bHH7SPR+jIwshRvPeFiY66udDxCIjRvLAD/elmEZ69SCb+P5oos7zTayF7HV1 Kg4zxBkJj9x/Fy8LsgJr =4nmq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From brian.suda at gmail.com Thu Sep 30 08:04:54 2010 From: brian.suda at gmail.com (Brian Suda) Date: Thu Sep 30 08:10:43 2010 Subject: [uf-discuss]
inside
In-Reply-To: <20100930134901.GA15029@mediacentre> References: <20100930134901.GA15029@mediacentre> Message-ID: > I am trying an hCard (which is contact information for the page owner in > this case) as a
inside
. ?The HTML5 validator does not > complain about this, but it doesn't seem to work for Optimus or > http://hcard.geekhood.net > > Specifically, when I feed: > >
test
> > Both of them say I didn't put an fn, but when I feed: > >
test
> > It works fine. ?Whaaaa? --- part of the problem might be that
is an inline element. So wrapping it around the
which is block level, it might be ignored in the parser and therefore you lose the class="vcard". -brian -- brian suda http://suda.co.uk From brian.suda at gmail.com Thu Sep 30 08:04:54 2010 From: brian.suda at gmail.com (Brian Suda) Date: Thu Sep 30 09:05:38 2010 Subject: [uf-discuss]
inside
In-Reply-To: <20100930134901.GA15029@mediacentre> References: <20100930134901.GA15029@mediacentre> Message-ID: > I am trying an hCard (which is contact information for the page owner in > this case) as a
inside
. ?The HTML5 validator does not > complain about this, but it doesn't seem to work for Optimus or > http://hcard.geekhood.net > > Specifically, when I feed: > >
test
> > Both of them say I didn't put an fn, but when I feed: > >
test
> > It works fine. ?Whaaaa? --- part of the problem might be that
is an inline element. So wrapping it around the
which is block level, it might be ignored in the parser and therefore you lose the class="vcard". -brian -- brian suda http://suda.co.uk From singpolyma at singpolyma.net Thu Sep 30 09:58:54 2010 From: singpolyma at singpolyma.net (Stephen Paul Weber) Date: Thu Sep 30 11:46:55 2010 Subject: [uf-discuss]
inside
In-Reply-To: References: <20100930134901.GA15029@mediacentre> Message-ID: <1285865934.11209.2.camel@singpolyma-N900> > > Specifically, when I feed: > > > >
test
> > > > Both of them say I didn't put an fn, but when I feed: > > > >
test
> > > > It works fine. ?Whaaaa? > > > --- part of the problem might be that
is an inline element. > So wrapping it around the
which is block level, it might be > ignored in the parser and therefore you lose the class="vcard". I thought it might be something like that... shouldn't the html5 validator scream at me for that then? From tdrake at yahoo-inc.com Thu Sep 30 12:26:46 2010 From: tdrake at yahoo-inc.com (Ted Drake) Date: Thu Sep 30 12:59:01 2010 Subject: [uf-discuss]
inside
In-Reply-To: <1285865934.11209.2.camel@singpolyma-N900> References: <20100930134901.GA15029@mediacentre> <1285865934.11209.2.camel@singpolyma-N900> Message-ID: I've been wondering about this, the HTML5 spec uses "flow content". Is that the same as saying "inline". I was hoping to use address around a dl as well, but it looks like we need to wrap the content within a dd, but then we lose the dt labeling text. Ted -----Original Message----- From: microformats-discuss-bounces@microformats.org [mailto:microformats-discuss-bounces@microformats.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Paul Weber Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:59 AM To: Microformats Discuss Subject: Re: [uf-discuss]
inside
> > Specifically, when I feed: > > > >
test
> > > > Both of them say I didn't put an fn, but when I feed: > > > >
test
> > > > It works fine. ?Whaaaa? > > > --- part of the problem might be that
is an inline element. > So wrapping it around the
which is block level, it might be > ignored in the parser and therefore you lose the class="vcard". I thought it might be something like that... shouldn't the html5 validator scream at me for that then? _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss From chris at chriscressman.com Thu Sep 30 16:27:16 2010 From: chris at chriscressman.com (Chris Cressman) Date: Thu Sep 30 16:27:19 2010 Subject: [uf-discuss]
inside
In-Reply-To: References: <20100930134901.GA15029@mediacentre> <1285865934.11209.2.camel@singpolyma-N900> Message-ID: On Thursday, September 30, 2010, Ted Drake wrote: > I've been wondering about this, the HTML5 spec uses "flow content". Is that the same as saying "inline". > I was hoping to use address around a dl as well, but it looks like we need to wrap the content within a dd, but then we lose the dt labeling text. Historically, the content model of address has been essentially the same as p -- it displays on a new line by default but may contain only text and text-level elements like em and strong. Address's content model has been "expanded" in HTML5. It may now contain most elements. However most parsers have not been updated to reflect the change, which may be the problem. Personally, I rarely use address since it usually provides no practical benefits. Chris